"Implicit governance is a slow killer for blockchains."
- @ilblackdragon
"Focusing on governance is a fast killer."
- @jrmr92
Blog on Near gov, house of stake. what do you think?
Blockchain gov
- Teams gotta push initially & attract 3rd parties
- Offer security, transparency, guidelines on upgrades & contributing for 3rd parties to opt-in
- Offer stakeholders (binding) input to well-scoped team/3rd party econ initiatives can be +EV
- Less change over time
image cut off key part “Eth always had best active user base”. there is little value in building comprehensive gov system beyond user security when you don't attract stakeholders (users, investors, builders) today. unlikely to be differentiator for stakeholder/ai adoption.
prios
1.76K
1
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.