Everyone says “agents on-chain,” but the hard part is who actually holds the keys and spends safely. That’s why @Talus_Labs planted its flag on Sui/Move: resource-oriented programming and an object model that treats assets like first-class citizens, so agents can act with real authority instead of duct-taped multisigs. Talus backs this up in the whitepaper: they call out Move VM security, the flexible object model, and parallel execution as the three pillars for Nexus workflows. --- And it’s not just theory. The Sui team’s own write-up leans into parallel execution for low-latency, high-throughput agent steps exactly what AvA Markets needs when matches spike. Pair that with Walrus for data (context/memory) and you get agents that read/write big blobs off-chain while keeping settlement transparent on Sui. ❯ Quick take for builders: define a Tool (typed IO), chain it in a DAG, let a Leader execute, and keep asset authority inside Move objects—clean separation of concerns, fewer foot-guns, better audits. (Nexus design + Sui’s model make this flow sane.) ❯ Quick take for users: this is why IDOLfun feels fast without sketchy custodies the heavy lifting scales, the money logic stays verifiable. --- Net: Talus didn’t pick Sui for vibes; it picked it so agents can actually own, move, and settle value at game speed. If you’re testing, watch how many steps stay parallel and how clean asset permissions look on-chain those are the real tells.